In
the last few years Silicon Valley in California has become prominent as companies
like Google, Facebook, and Apple have gained huge amounts of revenue and profit
from their products. That, in turn, leads to highly paid employees of the
company, who live in the San Francisco Bay Area (a.k.a. Silicon Valley) where
the companies are headquartered. However, a recent article published in USA Today
by Jon Swartz provides a remarkably deep look into the income inequality
inherent in the Silicon Valley power structure. Specifically, the article gives
a picture on Silicon Valley’s poor: those who do not have a high-paying job
with a tech company.
The article
describes the conditions in the forgotten parts of Silicon Valley with a wide
view. Swartz mentions the facts that most reporters do not in their looks at
Silicon Valley. Despite everything I have read about both these topics (low-income
people in America as well as Silicon Valley), I had never heard that there were
tent cities of homeless people in San Jose, California, with the largest having
350 people. I found it especially shocking that despite rich towns like
Atherton being next to poor towns like Redwood City, high-paid tech employees
do little to help the area’s poor. Particular attention is spent on the mostly
Black and Hispanic town of East Palo Alto, which is in the heart of Silicon
Valley yet gets none of the blessings of that position. Its crime rate has
always been very high, and went up again just last year. (Swartz 2014)
A
fact that goes unmentioned in the article is how imbalanced hiring practices
lead to income inequality, as the people who get jobs with the large technology
companies are of a very different racial makeup than the United States in
general. For example, Google’s percentages of black and Hispanic employees are
at astonishingly low numbers. A report earlier this year showed that only two
percent of Google’s workforce is black and only three percent is Hispanic.
High-level employment is even lower, with 1.5% of Google’s leadership being
black and 1% Hispanic. (Jacobson 2014)
Mark Zuckerberg (The World's Billionaires 2014)
The
values of the biggest Silicon Valley companies are growing at a rapid rate. The
net worth of Mark Zuckerberg, founder and CEO of Facebook, has grown as the company
he owns a large slice of has expanded. According to Forbes Magazine’s database
of the richest people in the world, he was worth 6.9 billion dollars four years
ago; now he is worth 34 billion. (The World’s Billionaires 2014) His income and
wealth grows as the Silicon Valley’s wealth stagnates. It appears that this
course is one that will be continued for the near future. In my next and last blog
post, I will consider some possible remedies for these growing inequalities.
Jacobson, M. (2014, May 28).
Google finally discloses its diversity record, and it’s not good. Retrieved
November 3, 2014, from
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/google-discloses-workforce-diversity-data-good/
Swartz, J. (2014, November 3).
Struggling in the shadow of Silicon Valley wealth. USA Today. Retrieved
November 3, 2014, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/11/03/east-palo-alto-philanthropy-facebook-silicon-valley/16244117/
The World's Billionaires. (2014,
November 3). Mark Zuckerberg. Retrieved November 3, 2014, from
http://www.forbes.com/profile/mark-zuckerberg/
I find this post extremely interesting. Not only Silicone Valley, but large-scale successful companies and start-up can usually be dominantly employed by one or two races, with limited diversity. I have noticed that a lot of applications for jobs or internships like to advertise diversity in the workplace. In addition, many applications have the Equality Opportunity Survey, which ask people about gender, veteran status, and race. I would only hope that these questions do not play a part in the decision process, and salary.
ReplyDeleteAnother point is that since three of the most successful companies are in this area, they should be doing what they can to work on income/salary equality in their area.
This was a very surprising article to read. It is amazing how parts of the world can be so incredibly affluent while also producing some of the lowest income earners. I also was very unaware how low the diversity rate was in such successful businesses such as google. I am pretty confused as to why, in an area inhabited with these billion dollar companies, is there no effort towards equalizing the living standard of those around them.
ReplyDelete