Enforcers of law. Protectors of the city. Figures of justice. Who do these phrases describe? Do these pictures of friendly looking police jog up your memories?
Are these the type of police your parents told you about as children; are they the ones who protect your neighborhood, the “good guys (or gals)” who fight the "bad guys (or gals)," and the ones who respond to 9-1-1 when trouble eschews? If so, that's great! If not, well, that's not so great. Then are you more familiar with these images?
When people think police, they tend seem them as symbols of justice and power. Yet with recent events such as with the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, the raising issue of police brutality is sweeping through the nation. There is increasing tension between the police and public as many feel that this brutality, this injustice needs to be stopped and controlled. This is an ongoing conversation about police overstepping their boundaries and using their power over citizens.
Over the years there have been multiple police practices in question such as:
How does this relates to our SOC 230 class: Race is still a big issue today! A survey conducted in August 2014 by the Pew Research Center and USA TODAY found that most Americans gave "low marks to police departments for holding officers accountable for misconduct, using the appropriate amount of force, and treating racial and ethnic groups equally" (Pew Research Center). While there is a mixture of reasons why the police received meager scores, having staggering differences in racial disparities in the makeup of the force can lead to a lack of community communication. There is much prejudice and discrimination between the police and public at times because everyone is wary of each other whether or not they admit it. Community relations between the local police and public is important because trust is necessary to protect a safe environment. If everyone is judging each other's potential violence by their skin color or clothing then this idea of "race" will continue to be ingrained into our minds.ere is much prejudice and discrimination between the police and public at times because everyone is wary of each other whether or not they admit it.
References:
Lippmann, Rachel. "Fuel In The Ferguson Fire: Racial Makeup Of Police Force Makes A Difference." St. Louis Public Radio. N.p., 14 Aug. 2014. Web. 25 Sept. 2014. <http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/fuel-ferguson-fire-racial-makeup-police-force-makes-difference>.
"Police Practices." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014. <https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/police-practices>.
Stark Racial Divisions in Reactions to Ferguson Police Shooting." Pew Research Center for the People and the Press RSS. N.p., 18 Aug. 2014. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. <http://www.people-press.org/2014/08/18/stark-racial-divisions-in-reactions-to-ferguson-police-shooting/>.
"Police Practices." American Civil Liberties Union. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014. <https://www.aclu.org/criminal-law-reform/police-practices>.
Stark Racial Divisions in Reactions to Ferguson Police Shooting." Pew Research Center for the People and the Press RSS. N.p., 18 Aug. 2014. Web. 23 Sept. 2014. <http://www.people-press.org/2014/08/18/stark-racial-divisions-in-reactions-to-ferguson-police-shooting/>.
It is scary to think that as we grew up we were always told to trust the authorities. That was when we were young and naive. We have grown up listening to the news that always mention evil activities in society. Its hard to believe that the police have begun to take on that role as well. Create blog post on the role of police and the brutality that we have been hearing about.
ReplyDeleteThis is a difficult issue, because it is nearly impossible to actually prove what the motive or intentions were of any player in an incident. While it may be very obvious to everyone involved or to anyone who witnessed an event, it is hard prove that racial profiling was behind the actions of the police. Police also may choose to target areas where they know they will get less resistance, because the people in those areas may not know the full extent of their rights, and police will therefore be able to get away with things that they should not. Not only is this harmful to those targeted, but it also means the police are turning their attention to places where they think their job will be easier, rather than the places that they should actually be looking. If they know they will be able to make easy arrests or write up lots of tickets in one area, they may do so in order to fill a ticket quota, which should not be their motivation for targeting people.
ReplyDeleteAs far as stop and frisk polices go, there is undoubtedly underlying tones of racism. This policy seems to blatantly promote racial profiling. Looking at statistics of those stopped and frisked, as well as arrested, there is a clear divide between whites and minorities. Is it because it’s usually whites doing the stopping and frisking? Or do non-whites look more suspicious? Whatever the answer, there is something that seems unconstitutional about being able to stop any person because of their appearance. That just sounds like racism. Speaking from personal experience, my father, who was a TSA agent at Logan airport for 12 years, told me some unsettling things about what he was taught to do. Though there were no quotas for stop and frisk in the airport, supervisors would often tell undercover agents and security guards alike to keep an eye on specifically people who appear to be of Islamic origin. This shows an unjust generalization about an entire population of people, which is a reflection of the stop and frisk policy.
ReplyDeleteGreat content material and great layout. Your website deserves all of the positive feedback it’s been getting. https://www.mosscolella.com/michigan-police-brutality-lawyer/
ReplyDelete