For years, people believed that the 20th century would hold no importance for
race and ethnicity in terms of characterization and economic classification. A
reason for the inaccuracy of this belief is rooted in the fact that people
simply feel connected to their ancestry and family history. Not only does it
exist in today’s societal characterization, but it affects the way that
different races react to and receive medical treatment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6813c/6813c3bba0d5c336fb15fac068ecbfcc3b3bf496" alt=""
Although race is not a biological factor, people that
characterize themselves as a given race often share biological attributes that
are present due to shared ancestry. An example of this is that Black, African
Americans statistically obtain sickle cell disease more than any other race.
However, is sickle cell disease a matter of race or is it something that arises
from geographic tendencies? Sickle cell disease, which in fact helps to resist
malaria, seems most existent in black, African Americans which causes people to
believe that it is an issue of race, when really it is an issue of malaria
location (Race).
This graph shows the statistics of race/ethnicity in terms of obtaining Alzheimer's disease once reaching 65 years of age. How is it so that for all three age groups, white people have the least chance of getting the disease than African Americans or Hispanics? This also begs the question of whether or not race/ethnicity holds any biological importance.
Another factor to take into
consideration when talking about medical care in terms of race and ethnicity is
the cost that treatment entails. In the poorer parts of the world it is
difficult to obtain proper treatment for certain diseases (Foerstel). For example,
treatment for cancer in Africa is not as effective as it is in the United
States, because of the lack of affluence and access to medical care. Although
we would like to believe that racism does not exist in contemporary society in
something as important as disease treatment, it quite possibly is a factor.
Because race is not a biological characteristic, it is difficult to prove why
some races react differently to treatment (Norris). However, until health care becomes
completely personalized, race and ethnicity will continue to affect medical
treatment decisions.
Work Cited:
Foerstel, K. (2008, September 1). Crisis in Darfur. CQ Global
Researcher, 2, 243-270
Norris, Keith. "On Race and Medicine." The Scientist. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.
"Race in Medical Care: Skin Color Matters with Patient Care." ABC News. ABC News Network, 21 July 2007. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.
Your article is really interesting. I haven't thought about that race and ethnicity will play a such an important role in health and medicine. Different race people can have different rates to get certain diseases. Also, physicians may treat their patient different by their races. I think that many factors can cause these problems. For instance, the economic differences and living conditions. Many poor African American and Hispanic American live in the heavy urban areas, where are always highly polluted. These conditions may cause the high rates of some diseases.
ReplyDelete